Device evaluated by manufacturer: examination of the returned complaint device revealed that the returned product consisted of the watchman access sheath (was) with an extra was with a dilator in the shaft.There was no damage to the extra was or dilator.There was blood inside and on the shaft.There were numerous kinks throughout the shaft.A microscopic examination of the valve did not reveal any damage or irregularities; however, it was noted that the threads of the was were damaged/cross threaded, it could not be determined when the thread damage occurred.The valve was open when received.An attempt was made to close the valve, and the valve was successfully closed without using forward pressure or without any difficulties.Functional testing was completed by closing the valve and injecting water into the was by attaching a syringe filled with water.There were no leaks or air bubbles observed during water injection.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The root cause is not confirmed as there was no evidence of the alleged issue or any anomalies which could have contributed to the reported difficulty.(b)(4).
|