Catalog Number UNKDCSCOIL |
Device Problem
No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
|
Patient Problem
Weakness (2145)
|
Event Date 07/01/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This is an initial/final report.Unknown part number, udi unavailable.In the literature article ¿neurological changes with abnormal brain reactivity following coiling of cerebral aneurysm.Possible reactivity to endovascular devices and material?¿ by sanjeet s.Grewal, md, eric m.López del valle, md, vivek gupta, md, navarro ramon, md, w.David freeman, md and rabih g.Tawk, md, published jvin, vol.8, no.3, pp.28¿36.Published july, 2015.It was reported that a female patient presented with headaches and underwent coiling of an unruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysm.A few days later, she developed left-sided weakness.Mri revealed enhancing white matter lesions in the ipsilateral hemisphere.The patient underwent extensive work-up and was treated with a prolonged course of immunosuppression.This report describes the case of abnormal brain reactions with significant neurological side effects following coiling of an intracranial aneurysm.The patient was treated with immunomodulation for a prolonged period of time and became dependent on this treatment to maintain the stability of her disease.Based on our interpretation of previous cases [8] and our case, the reaction is likely related to detached material from endovascular devices, as the enhancement was confined to the same vascular tree of the treated aneurysm.Although the insulting agent remains unknown, the reaction is not likely to be related to the pgla coils, as the patient had no reaction to implanted coil materials and pgla while off immunosuppression.At the time of complaint entry no device specific information, i.E.Catalogue/lot number, is available.Neither the catalogue number nor the lot number was available thus neither dhr nor fal could be completed.Neurologic deficit/consequences are known potential adverse events associated with the use of the codman embolic coils.The ifu for the codman embolic coils specifically states that neurologic deficits may occur.All products undergo a 100% inspection prior to release for marketing.Review of the information suggests that patient reactivity factors may have contributed to the reported event.
|
|
Event Description
|
In the literature article 쎅urological changes with abnormal brain reactivity following coiling of cerebral aneurysm.Possible reactivity to endovascular devices and material?by sanjeet s.Grewal, md, eric m.LӐez del valle, md, vivek gupta, md, navarro ramon, md, w.David freeman, md and rabih g.Tawk, md, published jvin, vol.8, no.3, pp.28-36.Published july, 2015.It was reported that a female patient presented with headaches and underwent coiling of an unruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysm.A few days later, she developed left-sided weakness.Mri revealed enhancing white matter lesions in the ipsilateral hemisphere.The patient underwent extensive work-up and was treated with a prolonged course of immunosuppression.This report describes the case of abnormal brain reactions with significant neurological side effects following coiling of an intracranial aneurysm.The patient was treated with immunomodulation for a prolonged period of time and became dependant on this treatment to maintain the stability of her disease.Based on our interpretation of previous cases [8] and our case, the reaction is likely related to detached material from endovascular devices, as the enhancement was confined to the same vascular tree of the treated aneurysm.Although the insulting agent remains unknown, the reaction is not likely to be related to the pgla coils, as the patient had no reaction to implanted coil materials and pgla while off immunosuppression.At the time of complaint entry no device specific information, i.E.Catalogue/lot number, is available.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|