Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: patient information was not provided by reporter.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.A manufacturing investigation was performed for the subject device (t-pal trial spacer 12mm x 32mm 12mm height, part number 03.812.512, lot number 9273166).The subject device was returned with the complaint that the device (trial spacer) broke during surgery.The tip of the complaint trial spacer was found in the applicator upon insertion of the next trial spacer.There were no fragments retained in the patient.The subject device was received with the knob at the end of the implant broken off as complained.The hardness and the undercut diameter of the subject device were measured and found to be within specification.As previously reported, the review of the device history records confirmed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the subject device that would have contributed to the complaint condition.Though a definitive root cause could not be determined, it is likely that breakage was caused by high mechanical force applied during use.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|