• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 5-9MM; KNEE IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 5-9MM; KNEE IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 180705-2
Device Problems Naturally Worn (2988); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 12/14/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
When completed, the investigation results will be submitted in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
Dr.(b)(6) informed me that he had to explant a (b)(6) old mako pka (medial uni).This was due to an infection that occurred after dental work.He said the implants were not loose malpositioned when he removed them.However there was some premature wear (or so he thought) on the poly.As of the time of removal the patient was doing fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following other devices were added to this report after submission of the initial report: mck tibial baseplate-rm/ll-sz 5, cat# 180615, lot# 14140509, mck femoral-rm-ll-sz 5, ofl, cat# 180515, lot# 26140610.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.An event regarding infection involving a mck tibial onlay insert-sz 5-9mm was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection of the returned device showed that the device is damaged on the inferior side due to attempt at implantation.Machine markings are still present.There are no signs of delamination or discoloration nor signs of premature wear observed on the device.Medical records received and evaluation: not performed as no medical records were made available.Device history review indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there has been no other event for the lot referenced and the sterile lot.Conclusions: the source of the infection could not be determined as patient information, clinical history, and results of bloodwork for infection were not provided.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time as insufficient information was received by stryker orthopaedics.If additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Dr.(b)(6) informed me that he had to explant a 4 year old mako pka (medial uni).This was due to an infection that occurred after dental work.He said the implants were not loose malpositioned when he removed them.However there was some premature wear (or so he thought) on the poly.As of the time of removal the patient was doing fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 5-9MM
Type of Device
KNEE IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
keyla colon
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5399572
MDR Text Key37151390
Report Number3005985723-2016-00045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/05/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/30/2015
Device Catalogue Number180705-2
Device Lot Number12221110
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/01/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/05/2016
Initial Date FDA Received01/29/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/22/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/20/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-