(b)(6).(b)(4).Investigation- the product was not returned to assist with this investigation; however, a review of the device history, quality control (qc), and instructions for use (ifu) was conducted for the purpose of this investigation.Per quality control specification, the tethering is inspected, verifying proper placement of suture within the stent; proper type of suture; proper handle, location and length; a secure knot and ensuring the tether is not tangled around the stent.A review of the device lot records and non-conformance history did not observe any quality related concerns associated with this case.The ifu details: "the stent may be removed easily by gentle withdrawal traction using endoscopic forceps." based on the information provided, the root cause is undetermined.Additional action is not required at this time, the residual risk remains at an acceptable level.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
|
A ureteroscopy with double j stent placement was being performed on the male patient.The stent was placed on (b)(6) 2016.The tether was left on the stent and the physician instructed the patient to remove stent using the tether after 48 hours.Sometime within the 48 hour period, the tether broke and was not found in the patient (patient voided tether).Stent was removed via cystoscopy by the implanting physician.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|