BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS HICKMAN 9 FR DUAL-LUMEN CV CATHETER, PEEL-APART INTRODUCER KIT WITH SURECUFF TIS; PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 0600600 |
Device Problem
Mechanics Altered (2984)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 01/28/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible; the manufacturing lot number that was provided is incorrect.Device not returned, at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
Per sales representative, facility reported that during placement, the tissue in growth cuff slid down the catheter shaft when pulling the tunneler.Catheter was removed ok and a new one was placed.No patient injury reported.(b)(6) 2016 per report from facility, the catheter with the loose growth cuff was never placed in patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a dislodged surecuff was confirmed, however the exact cause could not be determined.The implicated and returned product was a 9 fr d/l hickman catheter.At 20 centimeters distal to the bifurcation site, adhesive residue was observed, which appears to be the remnant of the surecuff.Tactile examination showed the region near the site of the surecuff, and the 5 cm proximal to the cuff site showed increased tensile weakness.Microscopic examination showed adhesive residue on the catheter.No functional deficiencies were found in the catheter aside from the missing surecuff.The tensile weakness indicates the catheter had likely been forcefully pulled from the proximal end, while the rest of the catheter was lodged in the body.The surecuff is supposed to be secured in a way that would be difficult to dislodge it under normal use.It could not be determined whether there were manufacturing errors that contributed to the observed failure, or if the failure was use-related.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|