NEURO - VILLALBA ACTIVA IMPLANTABLE EXTENSION; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 7482A51 |
Device Problems
Unintended Collision (1429); Low impedance (2285); Impedance Problem (2950)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Concomitant product: product id 37602, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2015, product type implantable neurostimulator.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a health care provider (hcp) via a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for dystonia and movement disorders.It was reported that the right implantable neurostimulator (ins) voltage was at 2.93v but is reading end of service (eos) and stimulation cannot be turned on.The patient was programmed with 0-2+ and has a history of normal impedance measurements; (b)(6) 2015: 618 ohms, (b)(6) 2015: 652 ohms, (b)(6) 2015: 1530 ohms, (b)(6) 2016 (eos): 1199 ohms.The patient was scheduled for surgery on (b)(6) 2016 to have the right ins and extension replaced.Follow-up revealed that health care provider (hcp) was surprised that the ins moved quickly to eos and is suspicious that there is an electrical short at, or near, the ins as there was a surprising change in the patient's impedances on the right side a few months ago.The hcp noted the patient has not experienced any clinical worsening as there is a delayed therapeutic benefit in dystonia.It was also reported that the patient fell in (b)(6) 2015.An x-ray was performed revealed there were no fractures.If additional information is received, a follow-up report will be submitted.Please see report number 3004209178-2016-03820.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received from the manufacturer representative (rep) reported that the right implantable neurostimulator (ins) was replaced.It was reviewed that the ins was showing end of service (eos) but the ins battery was at 2.91 volts.The physician thought it was the right extension that had a fracture, but when the impedance was interrogated, all values were normal and therefore the physician concluded it was an ins issue.It was reviewed that an x-ray had been done and showed no anomalies.It was unknown if palpation was done during impedance testing and it was unknown if taping of the ins was done to check for battery bouncing.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|