(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned.The reported separation and prolapse were confirmed although physical resistance could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances and difficult to remove could not be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.Based on the visual and dimensional inspection of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.The investigation determined the reported difficulties were due to the patients anatomical conditions.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with the respect to manufacturing, design or labeling.
|