(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr.: it is indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.A review of the batch history, historical trending, and similar complaint trending review for the product family will be conducted.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
|
It was reported that stent damage occurred.The target lesion was located in a narrow and curved vein.A 10.0-24 carotid wallstent was selected for use to treat the lesion.However, upon introducing the stent, advancement difficulty was met.Subsequently, the stent was then found to be damaged.The stent was removed and the procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.
|