• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION PRECISE PRO RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING STENTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION PRECISE PRO RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING STENTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PC0940XCE
Device Problem Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/13/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the gender of the patient is unknown.(b)(6).The device is expected to be returned for analysis; however, it has not yet been received.A device history record (dhr) review and additional information are pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event Description
As reported, the physician reported that stent has not been opened during the procedure.To procedure completed physician used another one product the same type.No consequences for the patient reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A device history record (dhr) review was conducted and the product met quality requirements for product acceptance.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was recently obtained that the stent could not be deployed in the patient and was removed with no deployment.This device failure is unlikely to cause an injury if it were to reoccur; therefore, this complaint no longer meets the required criteria for medical device reporting.This file was inadvertently submitted as a complaint under the medical device reporting regulations.No further reports are forthcoming.Additional information was received: the stent was unable to be deployed when the user tried to deploy the stent.The intended procedure was stenting for stenosis of the internal carotid artery.The lesion a stenosis rate of 80-85% and had low degree calcification with no tortuosity.There were no damages or anomalies noted to the device prior to removal from packaging; and there were no damages or anomalies noted to the packaging prior to opening.There was no difficulty experienced as the device was removed from the packaging.The product was stored, inspected, handled, and prepped according to the ifu.The tuohy borst (hemostasis) valve was in the open position when received but was not closed prior to removal from the tray.However, when it was removed from the tray, the stent was still constrained within the outer member/sheath.The stent delivery system did not pass through any acute bends or previously placed stents.The access site was reportedly located in the internal carotid artery.There was no difficulty encountered while advancing/tracking the sds towards/across the lesion and no excessive torquing was used.All the slack was removed from the stent delivery system prior to attempting to deploy and the tuohy borst valve was opened.There was no difficulty removing the stent delivery system from the patient and there was no unusual force used during the procedure.Another precise stent was used to complete the procedure.Analysis of returned product: one non-sterile unit of precise pro rx ous carotid system, 6fr, 9mm x 40mm, 135 cm was received coiled inside a plastic bag with an un-deployed stent and an open hemostasis valve.The precise outer body was found separated at 22.0cm from the brite tip.No other damages were found on the received unit.Functional analysis of the deployment process, while holding the outer member was performed and was successful.Dimensional analysis of the stroke length could not be performed due to the condition of the returned unit.Dimensional analysis of the catheter body inner and outer body revealed that it was within specification.Sem analysis of the separated outer member revealed evidence of material transfer from the distal section of the outer member in some areas; while other areas revealed little evidence of this transfer.This evidence of material transfer may suggest that the distal section of the catheter had been fused to the catheter body at some point.No other issues were noted during the sem analysis.A review of the manufacturing records for this lot of products revealed that it met specification prior to release.Based on additional information provided, this device failure is unlikely to cause an injury if it were to reoccur; therefore, this complaint no longer meets the required criteria for medical device reporting.This file was inadvertently submitted as a complaint under the medical device reporting regulations.No further reports are forthcoming.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISE PRO RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
SELF EXPANDING STENTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL
Manufacturer Contact
cecil navajas
circuito interior norte #1820
juarez chihuahua 32580
MX   32580
7863133880
MDR Report Key5553142
MDR Text Key42034536
Report Number9616099-2016-00172
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePL
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2017
Device Catalogue NumberPC0940XCE
Device Lot Number17274484
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/18/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/15/2016
Initial Date FDA Received04/06/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/28/2016
05/18/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/06/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-