• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY PROMUS ELEMENT¿ PLUS; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY PROMUS ELEMENT¿ PLUS; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493918432300
Device Problems Bent (1059); Difficult to Insert (1316)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/26/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device is a combination product.(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the stent delivery system (sds) was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the crimped stent found slight stretching of the stent on the proximal side and over the proximal markerband.The bumper tip of the device showed no signs of damage.The balloon cone profiles were reviewed and no issues were noted with the overall balloon profile.The balloon wings were tightly wrapped and evenly folded and were not subjected to positive pressure.A visual and tactile examination found one hypo kink 44mm distal to the strain relief.This type of damage is consistent with excessive force being applied to the delivery system and may have occurred during attempts to track the device over the guidewire.A visual and tactile examination found compression failure damage (accordioned) on the inner lumen 73mm distal to the port weld as well as damage to the inner 5mm proximal to the bi-component bond where the lumen was bunched together.This type of damage is consistent with excessive tensile force being applied to the delivery system.A 0.014¿ guidewire was successfully inserted during analysis through the tip of the device with little resistance in the parts where the inner lumen was damaged.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is considered handling damage as the event occurred without direct patient contact.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 29mar2016.It was reported that wire lumen restriction and catheter tip damage occurred.The target lesion was located in the severely calcified coronary artery.After pre-dilation was performed, the physician attempted to insert a 3.00x32mm promus element¿ plus stent on to the guidewire, but it failed.It was noted that the tip of the device was flattened.The procedure was completed with a 3.00x32mm promus premier stent.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was good.However, device analysis revealed proximal stent damage.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROMUS ELEMENT¿ PLUS
Type of Device
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5596616
MDR Text Key43277753
Report Number2134265-2016-03028
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P110010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/29/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/21/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/27/2016
Device Model NumberH7493918432300
Device Catalogue Number39184-3230
Device Lot Number17591708
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/28/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/17/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-