• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE NECK, SHOULDER & WRIST; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE NECK, SHOULDER & WRIST; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problem Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Received a 1 inch burn blister on her shoulder after wearing the patch [burns second degree].Case description: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A female patient of an unspecified age and ethnicity started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare neck, shoulder & wrist), from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history was not reported.The patient's concomitant medications were not reported.The patient received a 1 inch burn blister on her shoulder after wearing the patch on an unspecified date, this was the first time using.The outcome of the event was unknown.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.Company clinical evaluation comment based on the information provided, the event "burn blister" as described in this case is considered a serious bodily injury requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure, and the event is assessed as associated with the use of the device.This case meets initial 10-day eu and 30-day fda reportability.Case comment: based on the information provided, the event "burn blister" as described in this case is considered a serious bodily injury requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure, and the event is assessed as associated with the use of the device.This case meets initial 10-day eu and 30-day fda reportability.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] received a 1 inch burn blister on her shoulder after wearing the patch [burns second degree].Case narrative:this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A female patient of an unspecified age started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare neck, shoulder & wrist), from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.The patient received a 1 inch burn blister on her shoulder after wearing the patch on an unspecified date, this was the first time using.The action taken for the product and the outcome of the event was unknown.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.Follow-up (01jun2016): follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (07feb2020): new information received from product quality complaint group included: investigation was ongoing, and malfunction was left blank.Company clinical evaluation comment.Based on the information provided, the event "burn blister " as described in this case is considered a serious bodily injury requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure, and the event is assessed as associated with the use of the device.This case meets initial 10-day eu and 30-day fda reportability., comment: based on the information provided, the event "burn blister " as described in this case is considered a serious bodily injury requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure, and the event is assessed as associated with the use of the device.This case meets initial 10-day eu and 30-day fda reportability.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reasonably suggest device malfunction was no, severity of harm was not applicable and site sample status was not received.This investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number neck/shoulder/wrist (nsw) 8-hour product.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term].Received a 1 inch burn blister on her shoulder after wearing the patch [burns second degree].Narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer.A female patient of an unspecified age started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare neck, shoulder & wrist), from an unspecified date for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.The patient received a 1 inch burn blister on her shoulder after wearing the patch on an unspecified date, this was the first time using.The action taken for the product and the outcome of the event was unknown.The product quality complaint group provided the following investigation results.Reasonably suggest device malfunction was no, severity of harm was not applicable and site sample status was not received.This investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number neck/shoulder/wrist (nsw) 8-hour product.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass adverse event safety request for investigation.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Follow-up (01jun2016): follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (07feb2020): new information received from product quality complaint group included: investigation was ongoing, and malfunction was left blank.Follow-up (18jul2020): new information received from the product quality complaint group included: investigation results.Follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (06may2020): this case is being submitted to notify that the follow-up information previously considered to have been initially received by the company on 18jul2020 was instead received on 06may2020.Comment: based on the information provided, the event "burn blister " as described in this case is considered a serious bodily injury requiring medical intervention to prevent permanent damage or impairment of body structure, and the event is assessed as associated with the use of the device.This case meets initial 10-day eu and 30-day fda reportability.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE NECK, SHOULDER & WRIST
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
MDR Report Key5607989
MDR Text Key43641894
Report Number1066015-2016-00064
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/06/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/06/2016
Initial Date FDA Received04/26/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/06/2016
04/06/2016
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/14/2020
07/31/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-