During a bilateral stent placement, the tether stretched and broke inside the patient.The tether was removed from the patient using a grasper.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not require any additional procedures nor experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
(b)(4).Investigation/evaluation during the course of the investigation, a review of the complaint history, device history record, specifications, documentation, trends, instructions for use (ifu), and drawing of the product was conducted.The complaint device was not returned.Therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.The device history record was reviewed and there was no evidence to indicate this device was not manufactured in accordance to current specifications.The ifu for the device cautions the user not to force components during removal or replacement.It is possible that the user exerted too much force while removing the stent.Based on the information provided, the root cause is unable to be determined or reported at this time.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints and have notified the appropriate internal personnel.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.
|
During a bilateral stent placement, the tether stretched and broke inside the patient.The tether was removed from the patient using a grasper.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not require any additional procedures nor experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|