• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NIPRO (THAILAND) CORP., LTD. NIPRO BLOOD TUBING SET W/TRANSDUCER PROTECTOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NIPRO (THAILAND) CORP., LTD. NIPRO BLOOD TUBING SET W/TRANSDUCER PROTECTOR Back to Search Results
Model Number BL+A223D/V809D
Device Problems Coagulation in Device or Device Ingredient (1096); Occlusion Within Device (1423); Inadequate Filtration Process (2308); Device Operational Issue (2914); Filtration Problem (2941)
Patient Problem Coagulation Disorder (1779)
Event Date 04/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pending finalized investigation on returned samples.
 
Event Description
Blood clot noted on venous line (after venous chamber), filter in venous chamber did not prevent clot from passing through to venous side of bloodline: per field administrator, technician was returning patient's blood after treatment when tech noticed a blood clot on the venous line that passed through the venous chamber filter, tech immediately clamped the line and disconnected the patient.Patient was okay and was discharged home from the clinic with no complaints.(b)(4) 2016: clinical specialist was emailed to request the following information: is this patient with arterial venous fistula or hemodialysis catheter? what kind of heparin was treated (units / direction injection or syringe pump)? treatment condition (qb, qd, time of treatment).Answers: patient's access: avf, heparin: 2000 units bolus and 1000 units/hr infusion, bfr: 400, qd: 600, treatment time: 3hrs 45min (treatment time is prescribed treatment, patient completed the treatment, no blood was lost and patient did not have any reactions).(field administrator and tech were not there (b)(4) 2016 to answer the following: (will be obtained (b)(4) 2016): did tech notice clotting during the treatment? if so, where clotting was found? it seems like arterial and venous are connected in picture, please describe rinse back procedure the technician performed? answers: (b)(6) 2016: patient care technician didn't notice any clotting during the treatment, he only noticed clots on the venous chamber while returning the blood to the patient.For rinse back procedures, patient care technician followed the clinic termination policy: disconnected arterial line from the arterial needle, flushed arterial needle with saline using 10 cc syringe, connected the arterial line to needle-less port and returned blood with a bfr of 200.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pending finalized investigation on returned samples.On 5/25/2016: final investigation attached, results on retained and returned, used & unused samples.
 
Event Description
Blood clot noted on venous line (after venous chamber), filter in venous chamber did not prevent clot from passing through to venous side of bloodline: per field administrator, technician was returning patient's blood after treatment when tech noticed a blood clot on the venous line that passed through the venous chamber filter, tech immediately clamped the line and disconnected the patient.Patient was okay and was discharged home from the clinic with no complaints.On (b)(6) 2016: clinical specialist was emailed to request the following information: is this patient with arterial venous fistula or hemodialysis catheter? what kind of heparin was treated (units / direction injection or syringe pump)? treatment condition (qb, qd, time of treatment).Answers: patient's access: avf, heparin: 2000 units bolus and 1000 units/hr infusion, bfr: 400, qd: 600, treatment time: 3hrs 45min (treatment time is prescribed treatment, patient completed the treatment, no blood was lost and patient did not have any reactions).(field administrator and tech were not there (b)(6) 2016 to answer the following: (will be obtained (b)(6) 2016): did tech notice clotting during the treatment? if so, where clotting was found? it seems like arterial and venous are connected in picture, please describe rinse back procedure the technician performed? answers: (b)(6) 2016: patient care technician didn't notice any clotting during the treatment, he only noticed clots on the venous chamber while returning the blood to the patient.For rinse back procedures, patient care technician followed the clinic termination policy: disconnected arterial line from the arterial needle, flushed arterial needle with saline using 10 cc syringe, connected the arterial line to needle-less port and returned blood with a bfr of 200.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NIPRO BLOOD TUBING SET W/TRANSDUCER PROTECTOR
Type of Device
BLOOD TUBING SET
Manufacturer (Section D)
NIPRO (THAILAND) CORP., LTD.
10/2 moo 8,
bangnomko, sena
ayuthaya, thailand, 13110
TH  13110
Manufacturer (Section G)
NIPRO (THAILAND) CORP., LTD.
10/2 moo 8,
bangnomko, sena
ayuthaya, thailand, 13110
TH   13110
Manufacturer Contact
michelle tejada
3150 nw 107th avenue
miami, FL 33172
3055997174
MDR Report Key5624252
MDR Text Key44172337
Report Number8041145-2016-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FJK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K072024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2016,05/25/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/02/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2020
Device Model NumberBL+A223D/V809D
Device Lot Number15G08
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/27/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA05/02/2016
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/21/2016
Device Age11 MO
Event Location Outpatient Treatment Facility
Date Report to Manufacturer05/02/2016
Date Manufacturer Received04/22/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-