Catalog Number SGC01ST |
Device Problem
Physical Resistance (2578)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation (2001); Respiratory Distress (2045)
|
Event Date 04/15/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The customer reported the steerable guide catheter was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is filed to report that during use with the steerable guiding catheter, a suspected pulmonary vein perforation with bleeding into the lung occurred which required medical intervention.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.The fossa ovalis was tough and it took some time to pass the dilator and the steerable guiding catheter (sgc) through the atrial septum due to the resistance met.Two clips were implanted, reducing the mr to 2-3.A third clip delivery system (cds) was prepared for use, but before the cds was used, the patient's respiratory status deteriorated (spo2 decreased, blood visible in the endotracheal tube).The cardiologists and heart surgeon assumed a bleeding into the left lung via the pulmonary vein.The anesthesiologist could see some bleeding during bronchoscopy in the left lung.The procedure was aborted.The patient was stabilized with two thoratic drainages, bronchoscopic inspection/suction/application of norepiniphrine, double-lumen-tube, and catecholamines, and was then transferred to the icu.In the physicians' opinion, the bleeding was possibly caused by the guide wire during transseptal puncture and/or the sgc insertion into the left atrium, as the guide wire was positioned in the pulmonary vein.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.All available information was investigated and the reported physical resistance appears to be related to challenging patient anatomy.The reported perforation appears to be related to procedural conditions due to the guide wire transseptal puncture or the steerable guide catheter insertion into the left atrium, as the guide wire was positioned in the pulmonary vein; the reported respiratory distress was likely a cascading effect/symptom of the perforation.The additional therapy/non-surgical treatment, treatment with medications, and prolonged hospitalization were a result of case specific circumstances, as the patient was stabilized with two thoracic drainages, bronchoscopic inspection/suction/application of norepinephrine, double-lumen-tube, and catecholamines, and then transferred to the intensive care unit for recovery.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacturing, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|