• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS ANGIODYNAMICS / BIOFLO / DURAMAX; CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, IMPLANTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS ANGIODYNAMICS / BIOFLO / DURAMAX; CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, IMPLANTED Back to Search Results
Device Problems Air Leak (1008); Crack (1135)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/10/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As no part number or lot number were provided, it was not possible to conduct either a shipping history or device history review.The (b)(6) 2016 angiodynamics complaint report was reviewed for the bioflo dialysis product family and the failure mode, "extension leg failure." there were no adverse trends noted.As no sample was returned, a device evaluation was not possible and the root cause of the reported event is unable to be determined.The directions for use packaged with the catheter provides the following warnings: "in the rare event that a hub or connector separates from any component during insertion or use, take all necessary steps and precautions to prevent blood loss or air embolism and remove catheter.Use of excessive pull force on the catheter may cause the suture wing to detach from the bifurcate.Do not use acetone on any part of the catheter tubing.Exposure to this agent may cause catheter damage.Do not use sharp instruments near the extension tubing or catheter lumen.Do not use scissors to remove dressing.Catheter will be damaged if clamps other than what is provided with this kit are used.Clamping of the tubing repeatedly in the same location may weaken tubing.Avoid clamping near the luers and hub of the catheter.Examine catheter lumen and extensions before and after each treatment for damage." angiodynamics manufacturing process controls include 100% leak testing of all catheters, a guidewire insertion test to verify lumen patency, and visual inspections for damage or defects.(b)(4).Device discarded by hospital.
 
Event Description
As reported, hemodialysis catheter originally placed on (b)(6) 2015, was removed and replaced during the week of (b)(6) (exact date unknown) due to an air leak at the location where the tubing connects to the white luer lock.The used device was discarded at the hospital.The patient condition was described as "unaffected" by the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Returned for evaluation was a used catheter which was confirmed to have a small crack in the extension tube adjacent to the arterial hub.Measurements were taken of the i.Ds, and o.Ds of the venous and arterial extension tubes.Both were found to be within specification.There is no indication that the failure is related to either the manufacturing process or associated tooling.As a definitive root cause for this event could not be determined a capa has been initiated to provide further investigation and determine if corrective action is required.Manufacturing process controls for the dialysis catheter include visual inspection for damage or defects, 100% leak testing, and guidewire insertion testing to verify lumen patency.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANGIODYNAMICS / BIOFLO / DURAMAX
Type of Device
CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, IMPLANTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer Contact
law ryan
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls, NY 12801
5187424488
MDR Report Key5646330
MDR Text Key45044656
Report Number1317056-2016-00063
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MSD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K131260
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/14/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/03/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/14/2016
Initial Date FDA Received05/11/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/16/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-