• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Visual Prompts will not Clear (2281); Device Issue (2379); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 02/18/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The autopulse platform (s/n (b)(4)) was returned to zoll for investigation.Investigation results as follows: device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no similar complaints were reported for autopulse with serial number (b)(4).Visual inspection of the returned platform was performed; top cover wire stand was noted to be damaged.Autopulse 1.5 is a reusable device and was manufactured in 09/28/08.The damage found is characteristic of normal wear and tear for the life of the device.A review of the archive was performed and archive data indicated user advisory (ua) 16 (timeout moving to take up-position) and ua 7 (discrepancy between load1 and load2 too large) which is unrelated to the reported complaint.Functional testing was performed on the device and device passed functional test without any fault or error message.In summary the customer's reported complaint is confirmed during visual inspection.The physical damages found during visual inspection can occur due to normal wear and tear and/or physical abuse.The root cause for the observed user advisory codes cannot be determined.The brake gap inspection was performed and verified to be within the specification.Load cell characterization testing was performed and confirmed to be functioning within the specification.Run in test with the 95% patient test fixture (lrtf) was performed for several hours, the autopulse passed all the tests and meet all the required specification without duplicating any error messages.
 
Event Description
It was originally reported, by the biomed engineer that the autopulse platform's (s/n (b)(4)) head restraints were broken and needed replacing.When the device was received at zoll for repair, the archive log was reviewed and user advisories (ua) 16 (timeout moving to take up-position) and ua 7 (discrepancy between load1 and load2 too large) were observed.User advisories are considered reportable events, therefore the complaint was changed to a reportable event based on the investigation.There was no patient involved during this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
joy patel
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192957
MDR Report Key5657503
MDR Text Key45248276
Report Number3010617000-2016-00332
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
UDI-Device Identifier00849111000017
UDI-Public00849111000017
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/16/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0700-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/25/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received05/16/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/28/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-