The manufacturer was notified on (b)(6) 2016 that during the implant, surgeon performed cags x3 and avr (pvs25).Came of bypass and aortic valve had moderate central regurgitation.Patient was put back on bypass.Surgeon felt valve was well seated.The perceval valve was explanted and a magna ease size 21 was implanted.The patient has a pre-op peak gradient of 134: tbt 226; xct 179.First x-clamptime: 84 (avr & cagsx2).Second x-clamptime: 95 (removed perceval and magna e implanted).Patient outcomes: patient was taken back to theatre 0500 the next morning, no oozing.Inr 2.0 treated with novoseven f7a.Vascath inserted for acute renal failure.Dialysis (patient had a code blue during dialysis).Ph 7.09.Gastric bleed 3/5/16 (hb 4.0).
|
The complete manufacturing and material records for the perceval s aortic heart valve, model icv1210, s/n (b)(4), were pulled and reviewed to confirm that this valve satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a perceval s valve at the time of manufacture and release.The visual inspections performed on the returned prosthesis confirmed the absence of manufacturing defects.The hydrodynamic testing conducted on the perceval size 25/l heart valve prosthesis sn (b)(4) did not reveal any anomalies during the open/close phases as the valve demonstrated the correct leaflets coaptation and showed a regurgitant fraction in line with iso 5840 requirements.As a magna ease size 21 valve was implanted instead of the perceval size 25 valve, the central leak can be due to the use of an oversized valve.As a result, this could lead to an excess of pericardial tissue that could prevent the proper leaflet coaptation detected.
|