During the placement of the stent through a cystoscope, the stent sheared and half the tether was inside the patient and half was outside of the patient.Its unknown how the procedure was completed.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not require any additional procedures nor experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
(b)(4).A review of the complaint history, documentation, specifications, instructions for use (ifu), and trends was conducted during the investigation.The device is shipped with an instruction for use (ifu) that cautions the user not to force components during removal or replacement.The complaint device was not returned therefore, no physical examinations could be performed; however, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.It is possible that the user exerted too much force while removing the stent.However, based on the information provided, no product returned and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment (qera) no further action is required.
|
During the placement of the stent through a cystoscope, the stent sheared and half the tether was inside the patient and half was outside of the patient.Its unknown how the procedure was completed.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not require any additional procedures nor experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|