A lot number has not been provided, therefore a review of the manufacturing records could not be conducted.A review of the ifu shows that the surgeon was placing the sutures within the recommended distance from the edge of the device.However, as reported the mesh was placed under tension, it is unclear if this may have contributed to the reported event.As reported the device remains implanted.Without having the sample returned for evaluation we are unable to evaluate for root cause, as such no definitive conclusions can be made at this time.If additional information is obtained, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Remains implanted.
|
The following was reported to davol: it is reported that during a "retro muscular mesh placement" procedure, the bard phasix mesh was cut to size and as the surgeon was placing interrupted sutures, the mesh ripped twice.The first time the suture was about 1cm from edge, he realized that was too close to the edge but a few sutures later he placed another suture about 2/3 cm in from the edge and the mesh tore again.As reported, he placed the graft under tension.The mesh was left implanted and it was reported that there was no injury to the patient.
|