The customer reported that the patient's freedom driver was "very noisy." the customer also reported that the patient was switched to the backup freedom driver.There was no reported adverse patient impact.The freedom driver was returned to syncardia for evaluation.Visual inspection of the external and internal components revealed no anomalies.Review of the alarm history (eeprom) revealed one alarm code that occurred during the manufacturing/service process.No alarms were reported by the customer.The freedom driver was tested, and it met all test acceptance criteria, including normotensive and hypertensive patient simulator settings, with no anomalies, unintended alarms or abnormally loud noise.The driver was then tested for an additional 48 hours at normotensive patient simulator settings and performed as intended.The reported noise was not heard during investigation testing.The investigation concluded that the freedom driver performed as intended, and there was no evidence of a device malfunction.The freedom driver was serviced and passed all final performance testing.The reported issue posed a low risk to the patient because the freedom driver continued to perform its life-sustaining functions.This issue will continue to be monitored and trended as part of the customer experience process.Syncardia has completed its evaluation of this complaint and is closing this file.
|