• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORTHOFIX SRL LRS MULTIPLANAR CLAMP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORTHOFIX SRL LRS MULTIPLANAR CLAMP Back to Search Results
Model Number 50580
Device Problem Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of historical records orthofix (b)(4) is verifying the lot number of item 50580, communicated by the local distributor (lot v1556221 or lot b73).As soon as the lot is identified, the verification of the historical data will be performed.Technical evaluation: the device involved in this event has not yet been received by orthofix (b)(4).Orthofix (b)(4) is strictly in contact with the local distributor to have the device concerned.The technical evaluation of the device involved will be performed as soon as the device become available.Medical evaluation: the information provided on the event was sent to our medical evaluator.A preliminary medical evaluation is currently on going and will be finalized once further information and/or the results of the technical evaluation are available.As soon as further information are available, orthofix (b)(4) will provide you with a follow up report.Orthofix (b)(4) continues monitoring the devices on the market.
 
Event Description
The information originally provided by the local distributor on may 9, 2016 indicates: an lrs multiplanner new clamp was fixed to patient on (b)(6).Patient came back to hospital on (b)(6) 2016 for check up where surgeon found pin came out.The distributor attached to the notification, pictures of the event notified -pin coming off the clamp.On june 7, 2016, orthofix (b)(4) received from the distributor the completed complaint form reporting the following information: hospital name: (b)(6); surgeon name: dr.(b)(6); date of initial surgery: (b)(6) 2016; body part to which device was applied : left femur; surgery description: lengthening / correction; patient information: (b)(6), male, weight (b)(6), height (b)(6); previous health conditions: not known; problem observed during: into treatment/post-operative; type of problem: device functional problem -device failure; event description: after 10 days hinge pin came out.Surgeon managed to push back but again came out.Surgeon tried to hold with other u-clamp till replacement of multiplanar was done with another new one.Surgery was performed without any problem.Hinge pin of multiplanar came out after 10 days from surgery.The complaint report form also indicates: the device failure had adverse effects on patient -loss of fracture reduction; loss of distraction/correction achieved; the surgery was completed with used device; an additional surgery was required -(b)(6) 2016; copies of the operative reports are not available; copies of the xrays images are available; information on patient current health condition: after replacement of multiplanar so far no complaint reported.Condition is normal.Note: "based on our documents, lot number recorded from box of multiplaner was v1556221, other number stated on clamp is b73." (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of historical records orthofix srl checked the internal records related to the controls made on the device code 50580, lot b73 (lot laser marked on the component 500581), before the market release.No anomalies have been found.The original lot, manufactured in 2012, was comprised of (b)(4) devices.All of them have already been distributed to the market.According to orthofix srl historical records, this is the first notification received from this specific device lot.Technical evaluation: the returned device, received on june 17, 2016 was examined by orthofix srl quality engineering department.The device was subjected to visual and dimensional check as per orthofix srl design and product specifications.The visual check evidenced that the device was returned correctly assembled.Probably the pin was reinserted by the end user.Some scratches due to normal wear and tear were noticed on the external surfaces, but no major damages could be observed.The dimensional check confirmed that the device was originally conforming to design specifications.The functional check confirmed that all movements of correction and translation could be correctly performed.After the functional check, the device was dismantled in order to check the single components.It was necessary to use a hammer and a vice to make the pin come out, meaning it was well inserted in the device's body.Orthofix failure analysis concluded that it is not possible to determine a root cause of the device failure with the information provided.The pin may have come out as a result of a load applied on the axis of the pin.The application issues should be investigated to detect the cause of this event.Medical evaluation the information made available on the case was sent to our medical evaluator.Please find below an extract of the medical evaluation: " i note that this is the first complaint for 5 years of this device.In this case a (b)(6) man had a hypertrophic non-union of the left femur mid shaft, which is being treated with the lrs system including a multiplanar clamp.It seems that this patient has been treated very well, and the scan shows that the deformity has been fully corrected, with a normal limb axis.All we know is that the hinge pin of this device came loose, and the device was replaced after 10 days.This event was treated excellently and the patient is doing very well.The very carefully reported technical analysis does not give us a clear reason as to why the pin of this multiplanar clamp came out.The pin and the seating hole are within manufacturing tolerances.Therefore, we must conclude that there must have been very special circumstances relating to the application that caused this event." final comments the results of the dimensional and functional check confirmed that the device was originally conforming to design specifications.Orthofix failure analysis could not determine a root cause of the failure.The pin may have come out as a result of a load applied on the axis of the pin.The application issues should be investigated to detect the cause of this event.The medical evaluation evidenced as follow: "the pin and the seating hole are within manufacturing tolerances.Therefore, we must conclude that there must have been very special circumstances relating to the application that caused this event." orthofix srl historical records shows that no other similar notifications have been received in regards to this specific device lot.Orthofix srl continues monitoring the devices on the market.
 
Event Description
The information originally provided by the local distributor on (b)(6) 2016 indicates: an lrs multiplanner new clamp was fixed to patient on (b)(6).Patient came back to hospital on (b)(6) 2016 for check up where surgeon found pin came out.The distributor attached to the notification, pictures of the event notified -pin coming off the clamp.On (b)(6) 2016, orthofix srl received from the distributor the completed complaint form reporting the following information: o hospital name: (b)(6) hospital - (b)(6); o surgeon name: dr.(b)(6); o date of initial surgery: (b)(6) 2016; o body part to which device was applied : left femur; o surgery description: lengthening / correction; o patient information: (b)(6), male, (b)(6); previous health conditions: not known; o problem observed during: into treatment/post-operative; o type of problem: device functional problem -device failure; o event description: after 10 days hinge pin came out.Surgeon managed to push back but again came out.Surgeon tried to hold with other u-clamp till replacement of multiplanar was done with another new one.Surgery was performed without any problem.Hinge pin of multiplanar came out after 10 days from surgery.The complaint report form also indicates: o the device failure had adverse effects on patient -loss of fracture reduction; loss of distraction/correction achieved; o the surgery was completed with used device; o an additional surgery was required -(b)(6) 2016; o copies of the operative reports are not available; o copies of the xrays images are available; o information on patient current health condition: after replacement of multiplanar so far no complaint reported.Condition is normal.Note: "based on our documents, lot number recorded from box of multiplaner was (b)(4), other number stated on clamp is b73." manufacturer reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LRS MULTIPLANAR CLAMP
Type of Device
LRS MULTIPLANAR CLAMP
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORTHOFIX SRL
via delle nazioni, 9
bussolengo, verona, 37012
IT  37012
Manufacturer Contact
roberto donadello
via delle nazioni, 9
bussolengo, verona, 37012
IT   37012
0456719000
MDR Report Key5702909
MDR Text Key46687347
Report Number9680825-2016-00049
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSN
PMA/PMN Number
K955848
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/08/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number50580
Device Catalogue Number50580
Device Lot NumberB73
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/17/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/09/2016
Initial Date FDA Received06/07/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/09/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/18/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age25 YR
Patient Weight65
-
-