MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 3-8MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 180703-1 |
Device Problems
Naturally Worn (2988); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Injury (2348)
|
Event Date 05/11/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following other devices were also listed in this report: mck femoral-rm-ll-sz 2; cat# 180512; lot# 234708k-1; mck tibial baseplate-rm/ll-sz 3; cat# 180613; lot# 26040215-01.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was retained by the hospital and was not returned to the manufacturer.Additional information has been requested.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Not returned to the manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
Dr.(b)(6) revised a mako right medial uni knee to a primary tka.He said patient had pain.He said he saw nothing of concern when he revised the knee as far as much more advanced disease.No implant loosening or excessive wear.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding pain & revision involving a mako insert was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation could not be performed as the subject device was not returned.-medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "the fact that patello-femoral debridement was required at the primary uni-compartmental arthroplasty increases the likelihood that persistent and progressive osteoarthritis of the other compartments would cause pain and conversion to a total knee.There is no evidence that factors of faulty component design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation." -device history review: all devices in the reported lot were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other events for the reported lot.Conclusions: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated "the fact that patellofemoral debridement was required at the primary unicompartmental arthroplasty increases the likelihood that persistent and progressive osteoarthritis of the other compartments would cause pain and conversion to a total knee.There is no evidence that factors of faulty component design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation." a capa trend analysis was conducted for the reported failure mode and concluded pain may result from other factors not necessarily related to the device.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time as no devices and/or insufficient information was received by stryker orthopaedics.If devices and/or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
|
|
Event Description
|
Dr.(b)(6) revised a mako right medial uni knee to a primary tka.He said patient had pain.He said he saw nothing of concern when he revised the knee as far as much more advanced disease.No implant loosening or excessive wear.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|