• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE TI DISTAL EXTENSION SIZE 13/220MM RADIUS; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE TI DISTAL EXTENSION SIZE 13/220MM RADIUS; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04.641.123
Device Problems Break (1069); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Exact date of post-operative breakage is unknown; however, it was discovered via x-ray on (b)(6) 2016.The complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was returned.Device history record review: manufacturing location: (b)(4) - manufacturing date: november 14, 2013.Synthes lot 7508190 did not contain any non-conformance reports (ncr) or anomalies.All fourteen (14) pieces were accepted as conforming.The supplier lot (7167520) was also reviewed: the device history record (dhr) for the raw material indicated that the raw material was received at the (b)(4) facility in april, 2013.The dhr records further indicate that the raw material underwent all required inspection and test requirements with no non- conformities reported.No issues were identified during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) distal rib extension broke at the rod/sleeve junction.The patient was reportedly bent over while weight bearing when a popping sensation and pain were felt.At the emergency room (er), x-rays confirmed that the distal rib extension of the right medial veptr-ii device had broken.The broken extension piece was explanted and replaced with an identical device during a revision procedure, which was performed on (b)(6) 2016.All other components of the right medial veptr-ii device remained intact and implanted.The procedure was completed successfully with the patient in stable condition.Concomitant devices reported: distraction lock (part: 497.125, lot: unknown, quantity: 1) and proximal sleeve (part: 04.641.103, lot: unknown, quantity: 1).This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation summary was performed.The investigation of the complaint articles has shown that: the following complaint device was received by customer quality (cq): one ti distal extension size 13/220mm radius (part number: 04.641.123, lot number: 7508190, mfg date: 14nov2013) the part was received with the following complaint description: ¿a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) ii 220mm distal rib extension broke at the rod/sleeve junction.As the patient bent over while weight bearing, he experienced a popping sensation and pain.Emergency room (er) x-rays confirmed that the distal rib extension of the right medial veptr ii device had broken¿.Upon visual inspection the complaint condition is confirmed; as there is a transverse fracture, the fracture occurred approximately 8.10mm slightly above the most proximal hole of the implant.Additionally, the distal end of the device appears to have been cut and contoured most likely during the original surgery to accommodate for the patient¿s anatomy.The complaint condition is confirmed; the balance of the device is in fair condition; minor wear and tear consistent with an implanted device.A definitive root cause could not be determined; however, the type of fracture may have been the result of a static overload condition as stated in the complaint description.A visual inspection, drawing review, design history review, complaint history review, and risk assessment review were performed as part of this investigation.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TI DISTAL EXTENSION SIZE 13/220MM RADIUS
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
terry callahan
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5706897
MDR Text Key46825573
Report Number2530088-2016-10153
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK142587
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/25/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04.641.123
Device Lot Number7508190
Other Device ID Number(01)10705034750583(10)7508190
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/08/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/25/2016
Initial Date FDA Received06/08/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/23/2016
07/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/14/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Weight90
-
-