The customer reported that the patient had a constant fault alarm on the freedom driver while the patient's systolic blood pressure was in the high 150's.The customer also reported that the patient was brought into the clinic and assessed at which time the clinic staff was able to lower the patient's blood pressure.The customer also reported that the patient was subsequently switched to a companion 2 driver for further evaluation.The customer also reported that the patient was then switched to a backup freedom driver.There was no reported adverse patient impact during the driver changes.The freedom driver was returned to syncardia for evaluation.Visual inspection of the external and internal components revealed no anomalies.Review of the alarm history (eeprom) revealed one permanent fault alarm, which was recorded when the freedom driver was supporting the patient.This fault alarm can occur: - during power cycling of the freedom driver, which can take place at either the clinical site or prior to the eeprom reading during the failure investigation; - during onboard battery exchange while operating the freedom driver only on battery power; and - if an onboard battery is not fully latched in place, intermittent communication errors can result in a fault alarm.During the investigation, the freedom driver was tested and passed all test acceptance criteria, which included normotensive and hypertensive patient simulator settings, with no anomalies or alarms.The reported fault alarm was not functionally duplicated during investigation testing.The freedom driver performed as intended, and there was no evidence of a device malfunction.The freedom driver was serviced and passed all final performance testing.The reported issue posed a low risk to the patient because the freedom driver continued to perform its life-sustaining functions.This issue will continue to be monitored and trended as part of the customer experience process.Syncardia has completed its evaluation of this complaint and is closing this file.
|