(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Evaluation summary: (b)(4).The steerable guiding catheter (sgc) was returned for evaluation.The detachment of the dilator cap and teflon o-ring were confirmed via returned device analysis.The investigation was unable to determine a definitive cause for the detached rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) cap resulting in the detached o-ring.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
This is filed because returned device analysis found that the teflon o-ring was not observed in the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) or in the packaging tray; if, a device with missing o-ring to be used in the anatomy, there is potential for air leak.It was reported that during preparation of the steerable guiding catheter (sgc), the dilator cap was turned in the open direction to flush but the cap detached; it was not possible to re-attach the cap.The scg was not used in the anatomy and there was no patient involvement.There was no clinically significant delay in the intended procedure.No additional information was provided regarding the dilator cap.Subsequent returned device analysis found that the teflon o-ring was not observed in the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) or in the packaging tray.
|