The manufacturer did not receive devices, x-rays, or other source documents for review.As no lot numbers were provided for the devices, the device history records could not be reviewed.A cause for this specific event cannot be ascertained from the information provided.Note: the present case was opened on basis of additional information received for (b)(4) (mfr 9613350-2015-00938).Additional information received on june 01, 2016 reports a second patient with similar issue and the case at hand was created.Should additional information become available and an investigation result be available, an amended medical device report will be submitted.Zimmer's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|
A technical investigation was not possible to perform, as the devices were not at hand.However, based on the available information the investigation is conducted with outcome as follows.Trend analysis: n/a as no reference number was available.The dhr check could not be performed as the lot number was not available.Event summary: it was reported that the left l4 screw floated up in pus.Suspected infection.Implantation was on (b)(6) 2006 and revision on (b)(6) 2015.No medical data such as x-rays, surgical notes or any other case-relevant documents were received.Root cause determination using rmw: contaminated device would be used due to packaging defective due to inadequate storage conditions by the hospital.Not possible.The infection occurred 9 years after device implantation.Therefore, it is not suspected that the product caused or contributed to any patient infection.Contaminated device would be used due to unintended unwrapping of device packaging.Not possible.The infection occurred 9 years after device implantation.Therefore, it is not suspected that the product caused or contributed to any patient infection.Contaminated device would be used due to explanted implant used for new implantation surgery.Not possible.The infection occurred 9 years after device implantation.Therefore, it is not suspected that the product caused or contributed to any patient infection.Contaminated device would be used due to incorrect reprocessing procedure.Not possible.The infection occurred 9 years after device implantation.Therefore, it is not suspected that the product caused or contributed to any patient infection.Conclusion summary: the product related to the reported event was not available for investigation.In addition, no supplemental information (e.G.X-rays, surgical reports, etc.) was provided.Single-use, sterilized devices manufactured or distributed by zimmer are sterilized in accordance with fda regulations and iso standards.The gamma sterilization specification of the device certifies the suitability of sterilization.The infection occurred 9 years after device implantation.Therefore, it is not suspected that the product caused or contributed to any patient infection.Based on the given information and the results of the investigation, the complaint could not be confirmed as the alleged failure could not be identified or reproduced.The need for corrective actions is not indicated and zimmer (b)(4) considers this case as closed.(b)(4).
|