• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION HANCOCK AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION HANCOCK AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 242
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problems Corneal Pannus (1447); Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Endocarditis (1834); Hematoma (1884); Thrombus (2101); Cusp Tear (2656); Valvular Stenosis (2697)
Event Date 01/01/1990
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.The serial numbers are unknown, therefore no manufacturing or expiration dates are possible and no the device history record is possible.The gender is most prominent and the age is average age.The date of the event used is the year of the article publication.Citation: title: the pathology of hancock standard porcine valve prosthesis: a 20-year span of experience authors: marialuisa valente, marco minarini, gaetano thiene, uberto bortolotti , aldo milano, enrico talenti and vincenzo gallucci journal name: journal of cardiac surgery year of publication: 1990 issue number: volume 5, issue 4, pages 328¿335 literature reference: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1990.Tb00763.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information via literature review regarding tissue failure for late dysfunction of this bioprosthetic valve.All data were collected from a single center in 1990.The study population included 278 long-term bioprosthetic implants predominantly female; mean age 43 years).Serial numbers not provided.The average length of device implant time was 104 months.Among all patients, adverse events included: calcification, stenosis, pannus, thrombosis, cuspal hematoma( likely a complication of the patient's anticoagulation therapy), cuspal tears causing paravalvular leak, endocarditis (of a aspergillus species infiltrating the cusp tissue) and valve post-bending due to degeneration.In conclusion of the article it states that dystrophic calcification is the major threat to this bioprosthetic valve longevity and accounts for different modes of failure and clinical presentation, whereas primary tears play a negligible role.Eighty-eight percent of the failure were due to calcification leading to other factors.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HANCOCK AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5768003
MDR Text Key48711555
Report Number2025587-2016-00969
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P980043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/13/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number242
Device Catalogue Number242
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/13/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/04/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/13/2016
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/24/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age43 YR
-
-