• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS FOLATE III; ACID, FOLIC, RADIOIMMUNOASSAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS FOLATE III; ACID, FOLIC, RADIOIMMUNOASSAY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 07559992190
Device Problem High Test Results (2457)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/17/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).
 
Event Description
The customer stated that last year, they had a complaint concerning higher patient values obtained with folate iii (fol3) on a cobas 6000 analyzer.Patient values were higher when compared to values from an abbott architect analyzer.The abbott results were believed to be correct.No further details were provided regarding this previous issue.The fol3 reagent has since been re-standardized.The customer then continued to work with the new re-standardized reagent and had no issues.The customer has now called back reporting that they now continue to have issues with the assay.They state that when patient values recover over the measuring range and dilution of samples is required, the diluted sample result is too high when compared to results from the abbott analyzer.The customer provided an example for one patient sample that had an erroneous fol3 result which was reported outside of the laboratory.The sample initially resulted with a value over the measuring range and was accompanied by a data flag indicating as such.No specific value was provided for this result.The sample was manually diluted at a 1:2 dilution, then resulted with a final value of 32 ng/ml.The 32 ng/ml value was reported outside of the laboratory.The hematologist did not believe the result, so the sample was sent to another laboratory for testing on an abbott architect analyzer.The result from the abbott architect analyzer was 16.3 ng/ml.The customer stated that they believe that when they dilute samples, some kind of interference with the fol3 assay is involved.The patient was not adversely affected.The serial number of the cobas 6000 analyzer is (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The result from the abbott architect analyzer was confirmed to be 16.30 ug/l.The units of measure have been updated from ng/ml to ug/l.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A specific root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.Additional information required for the investigation was requested, but not provided.A reagent issue can most likely be excluded based on the provided control data.Possible root causes may be related to the sample being hemolytic, evaporation effects on the sample, or the sample was from a patient who was not fasting.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOLATE III
Type of Device
ACID, FOLIC, RADIOIMMUNOASSAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key5778304
MDR Text Key49074925
Report Number1823260-2016-00875
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CGN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSP
PMA/PMN Number
K082340
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/01/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number07559992190
Device Lot NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/08/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/19/2016
08/01/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-