Catalog Number 1010132-40 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 06/10/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Concomitant medical products: guide cath: arrow.The customer reported the device was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo lesion in the internal carotid artery with mild tortuosity, heavy calcification and 99% stenosis.After performing pre-dilatation with an unspecified balloon, a 6-8x40mm acculink self-expanding stent system (sess) was advanced toward the target lesion and the stent was implanted.The stent system was withdrawn from the patient anatomy and resistance was noted with the introducer sheath.It was not known that the stent system tip separated.Per standard procedure, an unspecified balloon was advanced into the introducer sheath to post dilate the implanted stent.However, it was noted that the balloon pushed the separated tip out of the sheath.The tip moved into the internal carotid artery, distal to the stent.A snare was used to successfully withdraw the tip from the patient anatomy.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties.The additional treatment/removal of the tip was due to case circumstances.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|