• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTXSFT0204
Device Problems Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/08/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following device code also applies to this complaint: 2578.Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the penumbra smart coil (smart coil) pusher assembly; the pusher assembly was kinked approximately 134.0 cm from the proximal end; the embolization coil was damaged and intact with the pusher assembly.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the smart coil pusher assembly was kinked.This type of damage likely occurred due to improper handling during use.If the device is forcefully advanced against resistance, damage such as this may occur.Further evaluation revealed that the embolization coil to the smart coil was damaged.This type of damage likely occurred due to forceful manipulation against resistance.The incompatible microcatheter that was used with the smart coil likely contributed to the friction that was encountered when attempting to advance the smart coil.The non-penumbra devices mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Smart coils are 100% functionally tested during in-process inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, while attempting to advance a smart coil through another manufacturer's microcatheter, the physician encountered friction.The physician made another attempt to advance the coil through the microcatheter and still met the same friction.After further examination, the hospital staff realized that they were using a microcatheter for a pipeline device rather than one for the smart coil.Therefore, the microcatheter was removed and a compatible microcatheter from another manufacturer was opened.The physician wanted to use a new smart coil to continue the procedure as the first one may have been forced or compromised.The procedure was successfully completed using a new smart coil and the new microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key5780725
MDR Text Key49128009
Report Number3005168196-2016-00952
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548015286
UDI-Public00814548015286
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/08/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date11/09/2020
Device Catalogue Number400SMTXSFT0204
Device Lot NumberF66442
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/17/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/08/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/09/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/11/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-