• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE INNOVA¿; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE INNOVA¿; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Model Number H74939180064070
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/27/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that stent deployment, dislodgement issue and fracture occurred.Vascular access was obtained via contralateral approach from the right femoral artery.The target lesion was located in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).Following the insertion of a 6f non-bsc introducer sheath and a guide wire, a 6x40x75 innova stent was advanced to treat the lesion.In addition, a second small 014 guide wire was advanced through the sheath and lodged in the profunda.However, as the innova stent was being advanced through the sheath, resistance was encountered and the sheath prolapsed out of the right common iliac artery.At this point, the stent was noted to have separated from the deployment catheter and was resting in the abdominal aorta.The innova stent deployment mechanism remained locked with the yellow stopper still in place.Subsequently, the innova stent delivery catheter was removed from the patient's body and was inspected and no abnormalities were detected.The yellow stopper was then removed and the thumbwheel was rotated to check the operation of the deployment mechanism which operated without any abnormalities.It was also then confirmed that the stent was missing from the delivery catheter when it was fully retracted.The innova stent was eventually pulled back into the common iliac artery with the assistance of an inferior vena cava (ivc) filter and sheath, and then with an endo snare.The stent fractured during the removal attempts and the remaining stent was removed via an open endarterectomy.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: returned product consisted of an innova self-expanding stent delivery system (sds) and no other devices.The outer shaft, inner shaft, proximal liner and the remainder of the device were checked for damage.The outer shaft was kinked at the nosecone.The middle shaft was damaged in 2 places, 1 at 15cm from the tip and the other at 17cm from the tip.The inner shaft was kinked 6cm from the tip.The stent was returned and was fractured.The pull rack was also separated from the handle.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that stent deployment, dislodgement issue and fracture occurred.Vascular access was obtained via contralateral approach from the right femoral artery.The target lesion was located in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).Following the insertion of a 6f non-bsc introducer sheath and a guide wire, a 6x40x75 innova¿ stent was advanced to treat the lesion.In addition, a second small 014 guide wire was advanced through the sheath and lodged in the profunda.However, as the innova¿ stent was being advanced through the sheath, resistance was encountered and the sheath prolapsed out of the right common iliac artery.At this point, the stent was noted to have separated from the deployment catheter and was resting in the abdominal aorta.The innova¿ stent deployment mechanism remained locked with the yellow stopper still in place.Subsequently, the innova¿ stent delivery catheter was removed from the patient's body and was inspected and no abnormalities were detected.The yellow stopper was then removed and the thumbwheel was rotated to check the operation of the deployment mechanism which operated without any abnormalities.It was also then confirmed that the stent was missing from the delivery catheter when it was fully retracted.The innova¿ stent was eventually pulled back into the common iliac artery with the assistance of an inferior vena cava (ivc) filter and sheath, and then with an endo snare.The stent fractured during the removal attempts and the remaining stent was removed via an open endarterectomy.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INNOVA¿
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5781908
MDR Text Key49146922
Report Number2134265-2016-06385
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAU
PMA/PMN Number
SIMILAR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2018
Device Model NumberH74939180064070
Device Catalogue Number39180-06407
Device Lot Number18074205
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/19/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/27/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/11/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/08/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/10/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
014 GUIDEWIRE
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-