Model Number D176 |
Device Problems
Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Pacing Problem (1439); Failure to Convert Rhythm (1540); Failure to Sense (1559); Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem (1573); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problems
Syncope (1610); Atrial Tachycardia (1731); Cardiac Arrest (1762); Ventricular Fibrillation (2130); Ventricular Tachycardia (2132)
|
Event Date 04/21/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information concerning this event is being requested from the field.This event will be updated should additional information be provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Boston scientific received information that one day post-implant, this patient suffered a cardiac arrest with prolonged pulseless electrical activity resulting in the patient having to be externally defibrillated.Review of the episode revealed the patient was in ventricular fibrillation and the device did not detect or deliver critical therapy properly.At this time, the device was reprogrammed and remains implanted and in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Despite multiple attempts to gather information from the field, no further details surrounding this event have been made available at this time.As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
--.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information provided from the field indicated this patient suffered another syncopal episode that required external defibrillation from paramedics to convert.Review of the device revealed that the patient had atrial tachycardia which conducted into the ventricle and caused ventricular tachycardia (vt).Anti-tachycardia pacing was then delivered but this accelerated the vt into ventricular fibrillation (vf) which the device could not convert with multiple shocks thus requiring external defibrillation.Another episode showed vf which was properly converted with an internal shock.The device was also observed to have recorded multiple faults during these episodes; one for a lead leakage fault and the other for a high voltage fault which appears to have interrupted a shock attempt during the episode.These faults may have occurred due to external sources and the device appears to have been functioning properly in reaction to them.At this time, the device has been reprogrammed and remains implanted and in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|