|
Catalog Number H787103012155 |
Device Problem
Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 06/22/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported defective sheath introducer has been returned to the manufacturer along with a scar, and an investigation into the root cause for event is currently in progress.The results of the device evaluation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.A review of the device history records was performed for the packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported (b)(6) 2016, a patient of unknown age and gender presented for a catheter placement.During the procedure, while the treating physician was placing the dialysis catheter in the patient's groin, the handles of the valved sheath introducer broke off.As a result of the fracture, 2 pieces of the sheath were left in patient's vein in the groin.The fractured pieces were removed, and the procedure was successfully completed.There was no report of permanent harm or injury to the patient due to this event.The reported defective disposable device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Returned for evaluation was one 16f valved peelable sheath.A visual review of the returned device noted that the hub was detached and in two pieces and the sheath was peeled.The device was forwarded to angiodynamics' vendor for analysis.The vendor performed an evaluation and discovered that the tube was not properly positioned during molding.The customers reported complaint description of the sheath fracturing is confirmed.It was noted the patient suffered no permanent harm or injury and is in stable condition.A review of the lot history records was performed for the reported packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance specifications the root cause, as stated by the vendor was "due to the tube not being properly positioned during molding, potentially related to an associate error in the positioning tube or core pins too smooth causing tube blow off during molding cycle." a review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|