• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1011343-40
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Physical Resistance (2578); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/28/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The stent remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The emboshield nav6 referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch mfr number.
 
Event Description
It was reported the procedure was to treat a lesion in the internal carotid artery.After placement of the emboshield nav 6 embolic protection system, the 6-8 x 40 mm acculink was advanced in the vessel, but could not cross the lesion due to the patient anatomy.The device was withdrawn from the patient and set aside.A 7 x 30 mm acculink was unpackaged and prepped, but a gap was noted at the tip; therefore, it was conservatively decided not to use the device as it was a very difficult vessel.The 6-8 x 40 mm acculink was re-inserted using the buddy wire and was able to cross the lesion.The acculink stent was deployed over the buddy wire and trapped the emboshield nav6 filter wire against the vessel wall.The 6-8 acculink stent was on the buddy wire, but should have been on the barewire.There were no adverse, neurological patient effects during the procedure.Unable to remove the filter, the patient was sent to surgery for cut down of the vessel to pull the filter out successfully.The patient is doing well.There was no adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.The emboshield nav 6 embolic protection system (eps) instruction for use (ifu): instructs, perform the required interventions over the barewire filter delivery wire.In this case, failing to follow the ifu caused the epd to become jailed resulting in surgery to remove the filter.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other similar incidents.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The investigation determine that the difficulties appear to be due to user error and there is no indication the issue was caused by, or related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.The surgical intervention was due to operational context.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5814291
MDR Text Key50307185
Report Number2024168-2016-04827
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040012
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/09/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/21/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2017
Device Catalogue Number1011343-40
Device Lot Number5031761
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/08/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-