• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE PROPATEN® VASCULAR GRAFT; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE PROPATEN® VASCULAR GRAFT; PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number HT066070A
Device Problem Degraded (1153)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 06/29/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Review of device manufacturing record history confirmed device met pre-release specifications.Explant evaluation is in currently in progress.
 
Event Description
The following was reported to gore: on (b)(6) 2016, a gore® propaten® vascular graft was implanted in a patient's leg, from the femoral to popliteal artery.As reported, the gore® propaten® vascular graft was aspirated at least four or five times since implantation.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient presented for treatment of a seroma.A section of the gore® propaten® vascular graft was explanted and a gore-tex® stretch vascular graft (ringed specification) was implanted in a revision procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was obtained from user facility voluntary report form.Per user facility report, a new propaten graft was used; however, the lot number that was provided matches to fep ringed gore-tex® stretch vascular graft with removable rings for the revision performed on (b)(6) 2016.(b)(6).Histology evaluation was completed and the summary report states the returned sections of the device evaluation process yielded no findings that would lead to a causation of seroma users are informed in the gore® propaten® vascular graft instructions for use: possible complications with the use of any vascular prosthesis a.Complications which may occur in conjunction with the use of any vascular prosthesis include but are not limited to: redundancy; infection; ultrafiltration or perigraft seroma; thrombosis; mechanical disruption or tearing of the suture line, graft, and / or host vessel; excessive suture hole bleeding; formation of pseudoaneurysms due to excessive, localized, or large needle punctures; or perigraft hematomas.Operative techniques section states: use a tunneler, such as the gore® tunneler, to create a tissue tunnel that closely approximates the graft diameter.A tissue tunnel that is too loose may result in delayed or insufficient perigraft tissue attachment, and may be a contributing factor to perigraft seroma formation.
 
Event Description
The patient was admitted for incision, drainage, debridement of a large right popliteal seroma.At the time of surgery, the patient was found to have involvement of the entire course of the femoral popliteal bypass graft with chronic seroma in the inguinal region as well, which has recently been enlarging.There were no signs of infection, no malodor.The previous aspirations had revealed negative cultures.A decision was made to place a new interposition graft.The graft was then excised and a new graft pulled through the old tunnel since there was no subcutaneous tissue available.The patient was then heparinized and a small nubbin of proximal and distal graft was maintained using fogarty hydragrips and a new fep ringed gore-tex® stretch vascular graft with removable rings was sewn end-to-end to both pieces.Heparin was reversed with protamine and there was immediate hemostasis.The entire tunnel was then irrigated and the serosal area burned using bovie® cautery until the entire area that could be visualized, both proximally and distally had been cauterized.The proximal wound and tunnel were then packed with surgicel.The wound was closed using 3-0 vicryl ________ and then surgicel was used to seal the wound.The distal wound was then treated by resecting as much redundant skin as possible and then closed using 3-0 vicryl and skin staples, again using surgicel.The next day the patient was ambulating, the graft was functioning well, and patient was discharged.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Explant date was entered.Small end pieces of the gore® propaten® vascular graft remained implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE PROPATEN® VASCULAR GRAFT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, VASCULAR GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL WEST B/P
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer Contact
genevieve begay
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key5822512
MDR Text Key50448034
Report Number2017233-2016-00652
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K062161
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/26/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/26/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/09/2019
Device Catalogue NumberHT066070A
Device Lot Number4917422PP010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/01/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/10/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient Weight60
-
-