• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK OMNISPAN MENISCAL REPAIR SYSTEM/27 DEGREE; MITEK MENISCAL IMPLANTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK OMNISPAN MENISCAL REPAIR SYSTEM/27 DEGREE; MITEK MENISCAL IMPLANTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 228142
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/28/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Although three separate events were reported in this complaint with 7 different devices, it has been determined that only one device is reportable as a malfunction.(b)(4).The lot expiration date is currently not available.Awaiting device return.
 
Event Description
(1 needle) the placing of the first meniscus seam was fine, when the second needle was loaded the silicone sleeve dissolved upon the peek 2.However, the silicone sleeve, thread, and peek residues could be removed under direct vision from the joint space.The placing of the first meniscus seam was fine, when the second needle was loaded the silicone sleeve was slashed, the second seam could not be placed.(1 needle): easy placement of the 1st and 2nd meniscus seam.However, the needle has bent during the procedure.Surgeon was visibly displeased with reference to the reliable products of direct competitors surgery was continued with same like product, all products that have been used were new products.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint devices were not received and is therefore unavailable for physical evaluation.The reported condition cannot be confirmed at this point.We will continue to remain receptive to additional information and update our records to reflect new findings.A batch record review has been conducted for each individual batch and the results indicate that these batches of product were processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints for these lots of devices that was released to distribution.At this point, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Although three separate events were reported in this complaint with 7 different devices, it has been determined that only one device is reportable as a malfunction.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint needle was received attached to the omnispan gun.Visual observation of the returned needle reveals that the needle is bent at an angle beyond its intended design.This failure can be attributed to the user technique where excessive force was applied on the device causing it to bend.The root cause for the reported failure is application error/user technique.At this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.This file will remain receptive to any potential forthcoming information received that is pertinent and germane to this issue.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.A dhr review has been conducted for each individual batch and the results indicate that these batches of product were processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints for these lots of devices that was released to distribution.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OMNISPAN MENISCAL REPAIR SYSTEM/27 DEGREE
Type of Device
MITEK MENISCAL IMPLANTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer lawrence
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5089776860
MDR Report Key5823730
MDR Text Key50674641
Report Number1221934-2016-10301
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K150209
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/28/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/26/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number228142
Device Lot Number3860692
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/18/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer06/28/2016
Date Manufacturer Received01/09/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-