• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS SENSAR; MONOFOCAL IOLS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS SENSAR; MONOFOCAL IOLS Back to Search Results
Model Number AR40E
Device Problems Bent (1059); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 06/14/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).If implanted, give date: not applicable as the lens was not implanted.If explanted, give date: not applicable as the lens was not implanted and therefore not explanted.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was initially reported that upon opening the lens case of an intraocular lens (iol), one haptic was noticed detached and deformed.The lens was not used and the surgeon implanted another iol, of a near diopter, as there was no back-up lens with the same diopter available.The operation was delayed of around 5 minutes.No patient injury reported.A photo of the lens was provided and it was observed that the lens was actually torn; a piece of the optic material including one complete haptic (still intact inside the radial hole of the lens) was completely torn away from the rest of the iol optic.No further information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The intraocular lens (iol) was returned at the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection at 10x microscope magnification showed that the lens had part of the optic section broken (near the edge).One lens haptic was observed distorted.The other haptic was observed detached.The detached haptic had a piece of the optic material attached to it.A depression mark (shaped arc) was observed across the lens optic surface.The condition observed was consistent with a iol that wasn¿t mounted properly into the lens case, and when it was closed the lens was damaged.The customer's reported complaint was verified.The manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.During manufacturing the lens must be positioned straight in the insert/lens case assembly so that the lens sits between the insert pegs.Operators must verify that the lens is mounted properly in its case.A search revealed that no additional complaints for this order number have been received.The directions for use (dfu) were reviewed.The directions for use (dfu) adequately provides instructions and precautions along with warnings for the proper use and handling of the device.As a result of the investigation there is an indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENSAR
Type of Device
MONOFOCAL IOLS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS
santa ana CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS INC.
road 402 north, km 4.2
anasco industrial park, pob 14
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
pam mcclain
1700 east st. andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478243
MDR Report Key5828271
MDR Text Key50616420
Report Number2648035-2016-01179
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P980040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date08/21/2020
Device Model NumberAR40E
Device Catalogue NumberAR40E00235
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/26/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/29/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/27/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/27/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/21/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-