• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 305U
Device Problems Gradient Increase (1270); Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problems Corneal Pannus (1447); Congestive Heart Failure (1783)
Event Date 07/12/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the product specimen has not been returned for device evaluation.Conclusion: without return of the product, no definitive conclusions could be drawn regarding the clinical observation.Should the device be returned or additional information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that 14 months post implant of this bioprosthetic valve, the patient presented with limited leaflet motion and gradients measuring 50mmhg, revealed by echocardiogram.The patient is in congestive heart failure (chf).The device has been explanted and replaced.Upon explant, pannus was revealed on the cusps of all leaflets with the heaviest appearing on the left coronary leaflet.No further adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: without the return of the device, the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the received information, the pannus overgrowth would have impaired the leaflet mobility leading to increased gradient.There are many studies which discuss the etiology of pannus.Pannus formation is patient dependent based on the possible underlying cause.Chronic pannus formation may be precipitated by an immune response to the bioprosthetic valve sewing ring and /or sutures and size of the bioprosthesis.It may also be caused by the presence of an injured endothelial surface potentially releasing fibroblast growth factor-2, blood flow turbulence, pregnancy and /or inadequate anti-coagulation.The time of pannus formation after valve implantation varies; studies have reported time frames from 6-12 months.The ingrowth of the tissue may gradually affect the function of the valve leaflets.Pannus overgrowth has been an inherent risk of surgical valve replacement.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the device arrived in a clear 0.2% glutaraldehyde solution in an explant kit.A piece of host tissue was received with the valve.The stent posts appeared slightly deflected.All leaflets were stiff due to host tissue on the inflow and outflow.All commissures appeared intact.A large remnant of pannus remained attached to the sewing ring adjacent to the left cusp, over the tissue and base stitching, to the left right inferior coaptive area, extending along the inflow margin of attachment and 1 to 4 mm onto both the left and right cusps showing a reduced inflow orifice area.A piece of pannus was received with the valve.Pannus lined the sewing ring on the outflow extending slightly onto the outflow rail adjacent to the non-coronary cusp and top of the right non-coronary stent post.An unknown amount of pannus appeared to have been removed on the inflow and outflow during explant.Tan thrombotic appearing host tissue filled and stiffened all cusps on the outflow.Radiography showed no mineralization in the valve and/or host tissue.Conclusion: the device was returned for analysis.Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The pannus overgrowth on the inflow appears to have extended several millimeters out onto the leaflet which would have significantly impaired the leaflet mobility (coaptation).The impairment of leaflet mobility may have led to the thrombus formation on the outflow of the valve causing the high gradient.High gradients due to immobile leaflets caused by pannus overgrowth / thrombus is a known failure mode and is addressed in the current risk management file.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5831600
MDR Text Key50712461
Report Number2025587-2016-01159
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/14/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/04/2020
Device Model Number305U
Device Catalogue Number305U229
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/23/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/12/2016
Initial Date FDA Received07/28/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
03/14/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/09/2016
03/16/2017
03/22/2017
09/24/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient Weight93
-
-