This device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient initials (b)(6).Udi#: (b)(4) lot number unknown.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Due to the intra-operative events, the device was not successfully implanted.An alternate device was used to complete procedural step.As such, implant/explant dates are not applicable.A product development investigation was performed for the subject device (2.0mm imf screw self-drilling 8mm, part number 201.928e, lot number unknown).The subject device was returned with the reported complaint condition that the screw broke in half during insertion resulting in a fragment being retained in the patient¿s mandible.The subject device was received with the tip/shaft broken off as reported.Only 7.9mm of the device was returned.The received portion of the subject device was received in good condition with no other observable damage.Per the associated technique guide, it is recommended that the surgeon pre-drill the hole for the imf screws when inserting into dense cortical bone.Drawings (manufactured/current) for the device were reviewed.No drawing issues or discrepancies were noted.The design, materials and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of these devices.As previously reported, a device history record review could not be reviewed since the lot number of the subject device is unknown.The exact root cause of the complaint condition is unknown.It is likely the screw was being inserted into excessively hard bone, and the lateral, levering force applied by the surgeon caused the screw to break.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|