• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; NAIL, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; NAIL, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Non-union Bone Fracture (2369); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Lechler, p and ¿et all¿.(2016).Surgical complications following (esin) for clavicular mid-shaft fractures do not limit functional or patient-perceived outcome.Injury, int.J.Care injured 47, 899¿903.This report is for unknown titanium elastic nails (ten) /unknown quantity/unknown lot.The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided.(other number) udi: unknown part number, udi is unavailable.(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature article lechler, p and ¿et all¿.(2016).Surgical complications following (esin) for clavicular mid-shaft fractures do not limit functional or patient-perceived outcome.Injury, int.J.Care injured 47, 899¿903.The present retrospective single-centre study aimed to analyse the complications following elastic intramedullary nailing (esin) in adult patients with clavicular mid shaft fractures and their impact on functional and patient-perceived outcome measures.Results were compared to a control group receiving locking plate osteosynthesis.Patients were assigned to group a (esin), using titanium elastic nails (ten) and group b (plate fixation).A total of 47 (33 male, 14 female) operatively managed patients with a mean age of 26.7 (+/-)14.9 years and a follow up time of 38.1 (+/-) 19.4 months were analysed.36 patients were treated by esin (group a), whereas 11 patients received open reduction and internal plate fixation (group b).Patients were operatively treated with a mean delay of 7.4 (+/-) 9.3 days (group a: 6.6 (+/-) 8.7 days, group b: 10.2 (+/-) 11.1 days, p = 0.326) between trauma and the surgical index procedure.The average follow-up time was 38.1 (+/-) 19.4 month (group a: 37.2 (+/-)17.9 months, group b: 40.5 _ 24.7 months, p = 0.655).It was concluded that, despite a relevant incidence of surgical complications, (esin) provides good to excellent functional and patient-perceived results in the treatment of clavicular mid-shaft fractures.This is report 2 of 3 for (b)(4).This report is for an unknown titanium elastic nails (ten) and refers to following adverse events: non-union was recorded in three patients.Implant removal and osteosynthesis by open reposition and internal plate fixation were performed in 2 cases.Reosteosynthesis resulted in osseous healing in all cases.In one asymptomatic patient presenting with a nonunion 27 weeks following (esin), no revision surgery was performed.Surgical complications were noted in 12 patients.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
NAIL, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
terry callahan
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5883541
MDR Text Key52338041
Report Number2520274-2016-14172
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Other Device ID NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/27/2016
Initial Date FDA Received08/17/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-