• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC. TUN-L-XL/24

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC. TUN-L-XL/24 Back to Search Results
Model Number A-EP-089
Device Problems Retraction Problem (1536); Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 11/03/2014
Event Type  No Answer Provided  
Manufacturer Narrative
On february 2, 2015, epimed received five tun-l-xl catheters; two of the five catheters returned had no visible skive or shear blemish's.Two out of the remaining three catheters were missing pieces of their outer coating.The account was emailed by epimed on february 3, 2015, informing them that two of the five catheters which were returned were missing (fep) catheter coating.On february 10, 2015, the account responded stating "we are sure that no pieces of coating remain in the patient's budy (body)".Due to the account reporting that "no pieces of coating remain in patient's body", epimed did not file an mdr at the time of when the event was reported.(b)(4).Therefore, epimed has opened subsequent complaint file (15-08-001-1, 15-08-001-2, & 15-08-001-3) to document each of the catheters which were skived/sheared.The catheter in question was discovered to have had approximately 4cm the outer (fep) coating sheared and missing from the catheter.In a good faith attempt to follow up with the account/distributor, epimed emailed the distributor, of the catheter in question (mr.(b)(6)).Mr.(b)(6) responded on behalf of the account on july 25, 2016, stating "they are not sure whether a piece of teflon coating remained in the patient's body or not, but they suppose that the piece is still remained in the body.And, the missing pieces of teflon coating haven't been removed from the body.The patient recovered and left the hospital".Due to this newly reported change in information epimed believes that it is necessary to now report this event as an mdr.Epimed suspects that the catheter in question skived/sheared due to the physician's technique.Also, based on the damage to this catheter, epimed believes that the corresponding rx needle may have remained in place during the attempted removal of the catheter in question.To epimed's knowledge, there has been no patient injury or adverse events reported in relation to this incident.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
On february 2, 2015, epimed was supplied with 5 tun-l-xl catheters, where the account reported the following: "the plastic is peeling off".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TUN-L-XL/24
Type of Device
TUN-L-XL/24
Manufacturer (Section D)
EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC.
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown NY 12095
Manufacturer (Section G)
EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC.
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown NY 12095
Manufacturer Contact
nathanael wrabel
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown, NY 12095
5187250209
MDR Report Key5885566
MDR Text Key52404831
Report Number1316297-2016-00009
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
K954584
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,user facility
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/29/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date06/30/2019
Device Model NumberA-EP-089
Device Catalogue Number155-2542
Device Lot Number11426382
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/02/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/02/2015
Initial Date FDA Received08/18/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/28/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-