• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SECX-10-60-135
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 07/21/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The physician was attempting to implant a protege rx carotid stent system in the left ica with eccentric lesion, mild calcification with very few tortuosity.Lesion length was 30 mm.The physician approached from the upper arm.The intervention went smoothly until the pre-dilation; however, the physician felt resistance upon delivering the protege due to the tortuosity between subclavian and common carotid artery.The physician managed to deploy the stent and post-dilatation was performed.Then the physician started delivering the dual end catheter in order to retrieve the spider, but the catheter failed to pass through the stent.For that reason, the physician decided to perform post-dilation again and attempted delivering balloon.However, the balloon got stuck at the proximal area of the stent and did not pass through the stent.At this time, 3dct was taken, and the physician confirmed the target lesion and proximal area of the stent, about 40mm, was deformed inward; the middle section of the stent was deformed, about 10mm of the stent, both proximal end and distal end, was expanded.Another balloon was used to pass through the stent but failed.Eventually, a non-medtronic 5 x 20 mm balloon was opened and delivered.The device successfully passed through the proximal of the stent, and the physician dilated the stent from proximal little by little for total 5 times, and expanded the deformed section of the stent.The dual end catheter was successfully delivered, and the spider was retrieved without further issue.Then the procedure was completed.The patient was discharged from the hospital 1 week post intervention, dapt has been continued and patient condition is currently being monitored.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Cine image review: ct scans from the procedure were received for evaluation.Ratio comparison of the length of the stent indicates that the majority of the targeted vessel anatomy the stent was oversized.The images show the non-concentric nature of the vessel even with the implanted stent.The images show the amount of inward protrusion of the stent in that section of the treated vessel.It is indicated that the stent is constricted in some sections.The profile of the stent exhibits a bifurcated heart shape.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key5888738
MDR Text Key52517438
Report Number2183870-2016-00574
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/19/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberSECX-10-60-135
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/15/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-