By way of a letter communication dated (b)(6) 2016 and received on july 21st, it is alleged that patient had a primary knee replacement surgery at an unknown date and was revised on june 28,2016.Update: partial unicompartmental knee replacement of right knee using makoplasty.
|
Additional devices listed in this event: catalog: 180613 description: mck tibial baseplate-rm/ll-sz 3 restoris mck lot: 32052915-5 catalog: 180512 description: mck femoral-rm-ll-sz 2 restoris mck lot: 2079521-1 at this time, it cannot be determined which, if any of the reported devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.Therefore, the event will be reported with one product and the remaining devices will be referenced in section h10 of the supplemental med watch report.An event regarding revision involving a mako insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual, dimensional, functional inspection, and material analysis were not performed as the item was not returned.-clinician review: rejected for medical review by dr.Jaffe today - no confirmation of event, need revision operative report, x-rays, patient demographics, clinical history and examination of explanted components.-product history review: a review of the product history records could not be performed as the lot code was not identified.-complaint history review: a complaint history review could not be performed as lot code was not identified.Conclusions: the reported event for revision could not be confirmed nor the root cause determined because the devices were not returned for evaluation and insufficient medical information was provided.Further information such as medical documentation and returned devices are needed.If the devices and/or additional information are received, this investigation will be reopened and re-evaluated.
|