During a follow-up, this device was displaying eos with an error message regarding the device being in back-up "fail safe" mode.After questioning the patient, it was discovered the patient had surgery recently.Eos was not a true eos.Device was reset with the battery showing 23% and normal device function.
|
We received your event description for the above mentioned device and would like to thank you for supporting our post-market surveillance.As of today, the medical device is not available for analysis, therefore the device itself could not be investigated.The information you provided has been entered into our quality system as a complaint.These types of complaints are used to evaluate systems and device performance throughout our organization and help to maintain and improve the performance of our devices.Should additional relevant information or the device itself become available, the investigation will be updated.
|
(b)(6) 2018 - this device was explanted (b)(6) 2016.We received a device evaluation.Upon receipt the device was interrogated, confirming the battery status eos.The icd was implanted for over 55 months and one charging cycle was recorded to the device memory after the device was reset in the clinic.The memory content of the device was inspected.The inspection revealed one vf episode which resulted from the detection of noise in the rv channel on (b)(6) 2016 at 13:08 o clock.As a result, the charging of a defibrillation shock was started.However, this charging cycle was aborted due to the activation of the battery status eos.Based on the analysis of the memory content it is likely that the application of a magnet in an unfavorable position took place during the episode, prior to eos detection on (b)(6) 2016.An unfavorable orientation in combination with a short distance between the magnet and the device during a charging cycle may lead to such rare clinical events.When there is a short distance between the magnet and the icd, and the orientation of the magnet is aligned to cause the magnetic field to be stronger over the high voltage transformer, a saturation of the transformer may appear during an ongoing charging, leading to a temporary drop of the supply voltage below the eos level, resulting in the observed battery status eos.This anomaly does not represent a device malfunction.This status is only achieved with the combination of an exact position of the magnet over the high voltage transformer, and the reduced distance from device to magnet during a charging cycle.In a next step, the eos status was removed with a technical programmer and subsequent interrogation revealed the battery status mol2.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.A fibrillation signal was applied and the device delivered a defibrillation shock as specified, documenting a correct sensing and shock delivery.In particular, the specified energy level was reached and the charging time was as expected.There was no indication of a device malfunction.
|