• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 540 HF-T; CRT-D

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 540 HF-T; CRT-D Back to Search Results
Model Number 360347
Device Problems Pacemaker Found in Back-Up Mode (1440); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 07/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During a follow-up, this device was displaying eos with an error message regarding the device being in back-up "fail safe" mode.After questioning the patient, it was discovered the patient had surgery recently.Eos was not a true eos.Device was reset with the battery showing 23% and normal device function.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
We received your event description for the above mentioned device and would like to thank you for supporting our post-market surveillance.As of today, the medical device is not available for analysis, therefore the device itself could not be investigated.The information you provided has been entered into our quality system as a complaint.These types of complaints are used to evaluate systems and device performance throughout our organization and help to maintain and improve the performance of our devices.Should additional relevant information or the device itself become available, the investigation will be updated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On (b)(6) 2016 device interrogated in eos.Performed a reset on the device and battery shows 20% again.Since this has happened twice, the doctor decided to get the device changed out soon.Devices remains implanted for now.Updated this to a product problem with malfunction for type of reportable event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6) 2018 - this device was explanted (b)(6) 2016.We received a device evaluation.Upon receipt the device was interrogated, confirming the battery status eos.The icd was implanted for over 55 months and one charging cycle was recorded to the device memory after the device was reset in the clinic.The memory content of the device was inspected.The inspection revealed one vf episode which resulted from the detection of noise in the rv channel on (b)(6) 2016 at 13:08 o clock.As a result, the charging of a defibrillation shock was started.However, this charging cycle was aborted due to the activation of the battery status eos.Based on the analysis of the memory content it is likely that the application of a magnet in an unfavorable position took place during the episode, prior to eos detection on (b)(6) 2016.An unfavorable orientation in combination with a short distance between the magnet and the device during a charging cycle may lead to such rare clinical events.When there is a short distance between the magnet and the icd, and the orientation of the magnet is aligned to cause the magnetic field to be stronger over the high voltage transformer, a saturation of the transformer may appear during an ongoing charging, leading to a temporary drop of the supply voltage below the eos level, resulting in the observed battery status eos.This anomaly does not represent a device malfunction.This status is only achieved with the combination of an exact position of the magnet over the high voltage transformer, and the reduced distance from device to magnet during a charging cycle.In a next step, the eos status was removed with a technical programmer and subsequent interrogation revealed the battery status mol2.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.A fibrillation signal was applied and the device delivered a defibrillation shock as specified, documenting a correct sensing and shock delivery.In particular, the specified energy level was reached and the charging time was as expected.There was no indication of a device malfunction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMAX 540 HF-T
Type of Device
CRT-D
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-123 59
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key5900063
MDR Text Key52865131
Report Number1028232-2016-02900
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number360347
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/06/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received08/24/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
01/18/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/06/2016
10/28/2016
02/07/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/20/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age87 YR
-
-