• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE TIP FOR DHS®/DCS® IMPACTOR (338.28)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE TIP FOR DHS®/DCS® IMPACTOR (338.28) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 338.26
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.There was no known reported patient involvement associated with the complained event.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device is expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation but has not yet been received.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot number, 4152301.Manufacturer: (b)(4).Date of manufacture: nov 24, 2000.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the tip for impactor was found in the sterile processing department with a split and a piece broken off.It is unknown when this damage occurred.There is no known patient or surgical involvement associated with the reported condition.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No service history review can be performed as part number 338.26 with lot number(s) 4152301 is a lot/batch controlled item.The manufacture date of this item is november 24, 2000.The source of the manufacture date is the release to warehouse date.The service history review is unconfirmed.A service and repair evaluation was completed: the customer reported the tip of the impactor was found split with a piece broken off.The repair technician reported the tip broke off.Tip broken is the reason for repair.The item is not repairable.The cause of the issue is unknown.The item will be forwarded to customer quality.The evaluation was confirmed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation summary was performed.The investigation of the complaint articles has shown that: it was reported that the tip of the impactor was found split and a piece broken off.This was found by the reporter in the sterile processing department.There is no known patient involvement or surgical procedure at this time.This complaint involves one device.The returned instrument was examined upon receipt at customer quality (cq) and the complaint condition was able to be confirmed as the plastic tip was found to be broken off and not returned.The balance of the device appears to be in fair condition with minimal signs of wear.Whether this complaint can be replicated is not applicable as the device is already broken.No definitive root cause was able to be determined however the failure mode is consistent with rough handling during impaction for this nearly 16 year old reusable instrument.A visual inspection under 5x magnification, device history record (dhr) review, complaint history review, drawing review, and risk assessment review were performed as part of this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.No new, unique or different patient harms were identified as a result of this evaluation.Additionally, the calculated occurrence rate is acceptable with the applicable design and clinical risk management occurrence rate.The returned part was determined to be suitable for the intended use when employed and maintained as recommended.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TIP FOR DHS®/DCS® IMPACTOR (338.28)
Type of Device
IMPACTOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
mark vornheder
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5907039
MDR Text Key53121765
Report Number2530088-2016-10230
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/12/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/26/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number338.26
Device Lot Number4152301
Other Device ID Number(01)10886982193292(10)4152301
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/30/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/30/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/24/2000
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-