(b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported separation was confirmed.The reported kinked tip was not confirmed; however there was a kink proximal to the tip.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties.
|