• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX RX OXYGENATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX RX OXYGENATOR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CX*RX25RW
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/15/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The actual device has not been returned to the manufacturing facility and the investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted within 30 days from the date that this report was sent.A review of the device history record and product release decision control sheet of the involved product/lot # combination was conducted with no relevant findings.A search of the complaint file found no report of this nature with the involved product/lot# combination.(b)(4).All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Event Description
The user facility reported breakage on the capiox device.Follow up communication with the user facility confirmed the following information: a small crack was noticed on the external part of the oxygenator; the procedure was completed successfully; and the patient was not harmed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted as follow up # 1 to provide the returned sample evaluation results.The actual device was returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation.Visual inspection found a flaw on the surface of the housing of the oxygenator device.There was no other obvious anomalies observed.Magnifying inspection of the flaw found the surface of the housing revealed it had been dented.Ct scanning of the flaw found that the housing wall had not been pierced all the way through to the other side.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction and the exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the investigation results.The device labeling does address the potential for such an occurrence in the instruction for use (ifu) with the statement such as the following: "inspect the device and package carefully.Do not use if the package and/or device is damaged." all available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPIOX RX OXYGENATOR
Type of Device
OXYGENATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, shizuoka 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer suh
reg. no. 2243441
2101 cottontail ln.
somerset, NJ 08873
8002837866
MDR Report Key5924138
MDR Text Key53795237
Report Number9681834-2016-00219
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTZ
UDI-Device Identifier04987350769572
UDI-Public04987350769572
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K040210
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/02/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/02/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2019
Device Catalogue NumberCX*RX25RW
Device Lot Number160420
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/05/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/02/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/20/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-