This report was initially submitted following notification that a customer the united states reported a misidentification of streptococcus bovis as lactococcus raffinolactis or unidentified in association with the vitek 2 gp id test kit.Subsequent sequencing test by the customer identified the isolates as streptococcus bovis group.Biomérieux investigation was conducted.Two isolates submitted by the customer were subcultured and after 24 hours of incubation, two distinct colony morphologies were observed for (b)(6).One morphology was determined to be staphylococcus and was not tested.The remaining colony morphology and (b)(6) were tested on vitek 2 gp id cards from the customer lot, random lot, and api 20 strep.- (b)(6): gp id cards gave three low discrimination calls streptococcus infantarius/streptococcus gallolyticus, and one low discrimination call of streptococcus alactolyticus/streptococcus infantarius/streptococcus hyointestinalis.- (b)(6): gp id cards gave low discrimination calls streptococcus infantarius/streptococcus gallolyticus twice, and streptococcus alactolyticus/streptococcus infantarius twice.- the api 20 strep testing resulted in good identification of streptococcus gallolyticus for both isolates.The low discrimination calls are acceptable as streptococcus infantarius, streptococcus gallolyticus and streptococcus alactolyticus all belong to the streptococcus bovis group, which is an older taxonomy for several species claimed by the gp id card.Review of the lactococcus raffinolactis data against expected reactions for streptococcus gallolyticus demonstrated one atypical reaction (amy) contributing to the misidentification.The investigation concluded the vitek 2 gp id cards are performing as expected.
|