Device history records were reviewed with no deviations or anomalies identified that would have contributed to the reported event.The depth gauge was returned for review.Visual inspection confirms the fracture, with the fractured piece also returned.Dimensions were found conforming to print specifications where measured.This device is used for treatment.An initial product history search conducted (b)(6) 2016 revealed no additional complaints against the related part and lot.The device was manufactured on 27 dec, 2014, with the described event occurring on (b)(6) 2016; therefore, the device had a potential field age of approximately 1 year 8 months with its field usage unknown.It was indicated that the surgical technique was followed, therefore, a definitive root cause for the fracture cannot be determined with the information provided.
|